Took My Chevy to the Levee, But the Levee…Was Full of Lead

Raymond Crawford of the Dallas Residents for Responsible Drilling group asked for all letters, notes, etc., between the City of Dallas and the Army Corp of Engineers over the issue of drilling near dams or levees. He put in a Texas Open Records Act request nine months ago. It was prompted by the fact that the Corps had asked Grand Prairie to suspend permitting gas wells within 3000 feet of the Joe Pool Lake dam and in a letter to that city had stated it would be contacting Dallas about the same issue since it owned the other side of the Lake.

Only, so far, there's no letter to Dallas that's been produced. That's what Crawford was trying to find with his request.

Monday, the city finally sent him some information, including an e-mail from the Corps to the City referencing the Grand Prairie situation and the 3000 foot "protective zone," along with an internal City e-mail that summarizes (incorrectly) that Dallas doesn't have any potential gas well sites near the Joe Pool Lake dam.

There is no e-mail or correspondence from the City of Dallas back to the Corps reporting any official inventory of sites that might qualify, so as of now, we still don't know what the city told the Corps in response to its inquiry. Did it later acknowledge that there was a site on the Dallas side of the Lake, or talk about how much of the land under and around the Trinity River levees was already leased fro drilling by the City? We don't know. We DO know that nobody at Dallas City Hall communicated this inquiry from the Corps into drilling sties close to dams to the City Council as a whole or the public.

Thanks to Crawford, we also know that the lower Trinity River floodplain near Cadillac Heights is a deeply contaminated area of Dallas that the city and the Corps is trying spin into being not quite so contaminated so it can go forward with a flood control plan that involves building and maintaining wetlands along this corridor. His request came back chock full of paperwork concerning the "Dallas Floodway Extension Project," a decades old plan that now seems to be wrapped up into the city's Trinity Rover improvements agenda.

Soil sampling that was done to explore just how contaminated this land is showed very high levels of lead and worrisome levels of Mercury, Benzene and other pollutants – down to 15 feet in depth, as far as the sampling went. This isn't all that surprising considering the stretch of land saw two lead smelters operating there for decades, as well as variety of other heavy industries. What might be considered shocking is that the Corp and the City want to take a lot of this contaminated soil and build up the existing levees with it. They propose to dig up the "not-so-bad" lead-infested soil from the floodplain, truck it over about 100 yards, dump it, and and pack it right back down back into the levee, leaving it all in South Dallas. Isn't that convenient? Only one problem. What the Corps and the City are saying is "not-so-bad" is worse than they're spinning it because they're using soil clean-up standards based on old blood lead alert levels that are now obsolete – 500 parts per million for residential use and 1600 ppm for industrial use.

If South Dallas residents were looking around for another example of how they always get second-class treatment, they could certainly contrast the language and clean-up strategy used in these e-mails with that of the recent Exide lead smelter settlement agreement in Frisco, some 30 miles and several income brackets away.